Ellie Pavlick tells us "we decided that meaning involves concepts in some way... If you use the word 'apple' to mean apple, you need the concept of an apple. That has to be a thing, whether or not you use the word to refer to it." And my opinion is, this is a category error. So it was interesting to see them actually find evidence of such a concept - "we found a small place in the model where it basically boils that connection down into one little vector... It's like this systematic 'retrieve-capital-city' vector." Is that what it means to, say, 'know' what an apple is? If so, though, then the knowledge and the thing knowing are one and the same thing - there's no 'concept' over and above the 'conceiver'.
Today: 216 Total: 216 John Pavlus, Quanta Magazine, 2024/04/25 [Direct Link]Select a newsletter and enter your email to subscribe:
Stephen Downes works with the Digital Technologies Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada specializing in new instructional media and personal learning technology. His degrees are in Philosophy, specializing in epistemology, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of science. He has taught for the University of Alberta, Athabasca University, Grand Prairie Regional College and Assiniboine Community College. His background includes expertise in journalism and media, both as a prominent blogger and as founder of the Moncton Free Press online news cooperative. He is one of the originators of the first Massive Open Online Course, has published frequently about online and networked learning, has authored learning management and content syndication software, and is the author of the widely read e-learning newsletter OLDaily. Downes is a member of NRC's Research Ethics Board. He is a popular keynote speaker and has spoken at conferences around the world.
Stephen Downes,
stephen@downes.ca,
Casselman
Canada
The first thing I did as I started to read this item is to look up X.509 Certificates on Wikipedia, which made me gulp a little. It's a bit daunting to grasp from scratch. The assertion in this post is that "the abundance of X.509 certificate authorities who already perform identity proofing for businesses provides a rich resource that can be leveraged to boot the verifiable data ecosystem." There are still questions to ask, for example, can we trust these authorities, are they accountable, are the costs reasonable, are they available, and of course, are they technically feasible for the wider population? That said, the idea is new to me, and represents another step in the thinking toward distributed identity (DID).
Today: 229 Total: 229 Phil Windley, Technometria, 2024/04/25 [Direct Link]
According to this statement from Harvard, "Harvard Library will offer new sustainable and equitable open access publishing models to advance open access scholarly communication." That's a good thing, and I support it, though I will remind people that that the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) has been doing this for years. Decades, even. My worry, of course, is that years from now people will talk about this as the 'start' of the open journals movement, as is wont to happen when a top tier institution adopts a practice like this (which is why we read, even in this article, things like, "I hope that many research-heavy institutions adopt our approach. The first Harvard Open Access policy launched in 2008 has been adopted nationally and internationally, and it would be great to see similar reach."
Today: 215 Total: 215 Harvard Library, 2024/04/25 [Direct Link]Matthias Melcher considers the question I asked yesterday: "what do we want the outcome of an education to be, comparing a student, an intellectual, a billionaire, (or) small-town inhabitants." Of course, none of these is ideal - but each of these represents in some way the ideals our education system seems to aspire to. But more, these four points are so different it's hard to imagine basing a single system on them at all. P.S. I created the image for this using chatGPT 4 - it struck me how similar it was to working with a human designer (eg., I asked for four people, the first version had five people, etc).
Today: 220 Total: 220 Matthias Melcher, x28's New Blog, 2024/04/25 [Direct Link]The headline is that the United States may soon ban TikTok, a story remarkable in its own right. The underlying thread is that centralized social media services (TikTok, Twitter, Facebook, etc) have become too unstable for individuals and businesses to rely on. Buried deep is the main story: that the only way to reliably access an audience is to give up on platforms trying to control access to it. Hence, "Vox Media's technology news publication The Verge says it also has plans to federate its own site to have more ownership over its content and audience." Via Ben Werdmuller.
Today: 94 Total: 347 Kimeko McCoy, Digiday, 2024/04/24 [Direct Link]There are many ways to read this article. I'm here for the way the author criticizes billionaires, but that's not why I'm sharing it, that's just a bonus. No, what I ask readers to consider is what we want the outcome of an education to be by considering the four points of a pyramid: a young Marc Andreesen who as a student at a public university was able to develop the first commercial web browser; the second, the author of the piece, an apparent 'intellectual', familiar with the works of Agnes Martin, Claes Oldenburg, Julius Evola and Corey Robin; the aforementioned billionaire who believes people like him "should get to make decisions to reorder life as we know it without interference from anyone else"; or the people in small towns who value "the ordinary comforts of kinship, friendship, craft, memory, legend, lore, skills passed down across generations." Don't answer too quickly. Via Dan Gillmor.
Today: 122 Total: 625 Rick Perlstein, The American Prospect, 2024/04/24 [Direct Link]Web - Today's OLDaily
OLDaily Email - Subscribe
Web - This Week's OLWeekly
OLWeekly Email - Subscribe
RSS - Individual Posts
RSS - Combined version
Podcast - OLDaily Audio
Websites
Stephen's Web and OLDaily
Half an Hour Blog
Leftish Blog
MOOC.ca
Stephen's Guide to the Logical Fallacies
gRSShopper
Let's Make Some Art Dammit
Email: stephen@downes.ca
Email: Stephen.Downes@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Skype: Downes
Professional
National Research Council Canada
Publications
Presentations
All My Articles
My eBooks
About Stephen Downes
About Stephen's Web
About OLDaily
Subscribe to Newsletters
gRSShopper
Privacy and Security Policy
Statistics
Archives
Courses
CCK 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012
PLENK 2010
Change 11 - 2011
Education Futures - 2012
Learning Analytics - 2012
REL 2014
Personal Learning - 2015
Connectivism and Learning - 2016
E-Learning 3.0 MOOC - 2018
Ethics, Analytics - 2020
Stephen Downes, Casselman, Canada
stephen@downes.ca
Last Updated: Apr 25, 2024 11:37 p.m.