Open sesame
When research is funded by the taxpayer or by charities, the results should be available to all without charge
PUBLISHING obscure academic journals is that rare thing in the media industry: a licence to print money. An annual subscription to Tetrahedron, a chemistry journal, will cost your university library $20,269; a year of the Journal of Mathematical Sciences will set you back $20,100. In 2011 Elsevier, the biggest academic-journal publisher, made a profit of £768m ($1.2 billion) on revenues of £2.1 billion. Such margins (37%, up from 36% in 2010) are possible because the journals' content is largely provided free by researchers, and the academics who peer-review their papers are usually unpaid volunteers. The journals are then sold to the very universities that provide the free content and labour. For publicly funded research, the result is that the academics and taxpayers who were responsible for its creation have to pay to read it. This is not merely absurd and unjust; it also hampers education and research.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Open sesame”
From the April 14th 2012 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
How to keep AI models on the straight and narrow
Interpretability techniques are powerful, but must be used with care
Africans need jobs. The rest of the world needs workers
Migration from Africa is a mega-trend that transcends today’s populist surge
How Canada went from preachy to pragmatic
On the eve of an election, its political transformation is stunning
The man Britain cannot ignore
Nigel Farage’s return means a new, more volatile era in British politics
Trump is a revolutionary. Will he succeed?
He has already done lasting harm to America
President Trump’s attacks on the Fed are not over
Jerome Powell wins a reprieve. But expect more showdowns between the White House and the Fed