Protect authors’ livelihoods from the unlicensed use of their work in AI training

Protect authors’ livelihoods from the unlicensed use of their work in AI training

Recent signers
Sandra Ashley and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

The Society of Authors has written to the Right Hon Lisa Nandy, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, demanding that Meta is held to account by the UK government following allegations in the U.S. that authors’ works have been used without permission or remuneration to train its AI model. Please add your name to the open letter to help us raise authors’ voices.

 

The Rt Hon Lisa Nandy, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport

Cc: Sir Chris Bryant, Minister for Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism

Dear Secretary of State,  

RE: REPORTS OF WHOLESALE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT BY META

We are writing to you following the publication on 20 March 2025 of a report in The Atlantic under the headline ‘The Unbelievable Scale of AI’s Pirated-Books Problem’ (“the Atlantic article”). The Atlantic article reports on the evidence which has been revealed in court documents in legal proceedings which are being pursued against Meta in the Unites States.

The Atlantic article contains a number of shocking allegations about the practices which were adopted by Meta at the time of the development of its AI model, Llama 3. The allegations have profound implications for UK authors (including writers, illustrators, translators, scriptwriters, etc.), and we are calling on you and the Labour government to take immediate, decisive action.

As with all large language models, Llama 3 needed to be trained on a huge amount of material in which copyright is owned by authors and for which, consent from the rightsholders was required and adequate remuneration paid. Yet the evidence reported in The Atlantic article supports the allegation that, instead, decisions were taken at the very highest level at Meta, to download and use the Library Genesis database (“the Lib Gen database”), which is one of the largest pirated collections of books available globally, containing over 7.5 million books and 81 million research papers. 

Since publication of The Atlantic article, authors across the UK have been angered by the discovery that their works appear in the ‘Lib Gen’ database. Authors are rightly concerned that their works have been used without their permission to train Llama 3 — a clear infringement of copyright law. Meta must be held accountable, and the UK government must play its part. 

The case on which The Atlantic article reports is just one of numerous cases being taken by publishers and authors against Meta for copyright infringement on an industrial scale. These cases are shining a light on the unscrupulous behaviour exhibited by global tech companies which seemingly exploit copyright-protected material, safe in the knowledge that they will not be held to account. This must change, and global tech companies must now be held accountable and pay for the use they make of authors’ works.

There can be no question that the scraping of authors’ works for the purpose of generative AI training is unlawful in the UK, yet tech giants like Meta are operating in the UK without sufficient enquiry being made into their practices and those of their parent companies. Authors are almost powerless given the enormous cost and complexities of pursuing litigation against corporate defendants with such deep pockets. We call upon you and the UK Government to take all action available to ensure that the rights, interests and livelihoods of authors are adequately protected. Failure to act without further delay will unquestionably have a catastrophic and irreversible impact on all UK authors given that from development through to output, creators’ rights are being systematically and repeatedly ignored.

If, as you say, your Government is serious about supporting authors as part of its Creative Industry Sector Plan, and its ambition to grow and protect the UK’s world-leading creative industries which contribute £126 billion a year to the UK’s GVA, it must demonstrate its commitment and stand up against the unethical and illegal practices of tech giants, which have such a devasting impact on the lives of UK authors. 

We, the undersigned, call on the Secretary of State to intervene by summoning senior executives of Meta to appear before Parliament. They must be required to provide a detailed response to the allegations that they have engaged in wholesale copyright infringement and to provide unequivocal assurances that they will respect the copyright of authors, not engage in unlawful conduct and will pay authors for all historic infringements.

 

Signed by:-

Anna Ganley, Chief Executive

Vanessa Fox O'Loughlin/Sam Blake, Management Committee Chair           

AJ West

Richard Osman 

Vaseem Khan

Lindsey Davis

Charles Harris 

Hilary Spurling

Daniel Hahn 

Sarah Waters

Val McDermid

Judy Garton-Sprenger 

Sir Kazuo Ishiguro 

Sir Tom Stoppard

Joanne Harris 

Julia Williams 

William Horwood

Harriet Evans

Paula Hawkins

Juliet McKenna

Gwyneth Lewis

Philip Womack 

Kate Mosse

44,154

Sandra Ashley and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

The Society of Authors has written to the Right Hon Lisa Nandy, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, demanding that Meta is held to account by the UK government following allegations in the U.S. that authors’ works have been used without permission or remuneration to train its AI model. Please add your name to the open letter to help us raise authors’ voices.

 

The Rt Hon Lisa Nandy, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport

Cc: Sir Chris Bryant, Minister for Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism

Dear Secretary of State,  

RE: REPORTS OF WHOLESALE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT BY META

We are writing to you following the publication on 20 March 2025 of a report in The Atlantic under the headline ‘The Unbelievable Scale of AI’s Pirated-Books Problem’ (“the Atlantic article”). The Atlantic article reports on the evidence which has been revealed in court documents in legal proceedings which are being pursued against Meta in the Unites States.

The Atlantic article contains a number of shocking allegations about the practices which were adopted by Meta at the time of the development of its AI model, Llama 3. The allegations have profound implications for UK authors (including writers, illustrators, translators, scriptwriters, etc.), and we are calling on you and the Labour government to take immediate, decisive action.

As with all large language models, Llama 3 needed to be trained on a huge amount of material in which copyright is owned by authors and for which, consent from the rightsholders was required and adequate remuneration paid. Yet the evidence reported in The Atlantic article supports the allegation that, instead, decisions were taken at the very highest level at Meta, to download and use the Library Genesis database (“the Lib Gen database”), which is one of the largest pirated collections of books available globally, containing over 7.5 million books and 81 million research papers. 

Since publication of The Atlantic article, authors across the UK have been angered by the discovery that their works appear in the ‘Lib Gen’ database. Authors are rightly concerned that their works have been used without their permission to train Llama 3 — a clear infringement of copyright law. Meta must be held accountable, and the UK government must play its part. 

The case on which The Atlantic article reports is just one of numerous cases being taken by publishers and authors against Meta for copyright infringement on an industrial scale. These cases are shining a light on the unscrupulous behaviour exhibited by global tech companies which seemingly exploit copyright-protected material, safe in the knowledge that they will not be held to account. This must change, and global tech companies must now be held accountable and pay for the use they make of authors’ works.

There can be no question that the scraping of authors’ works for the purpose of generative AI training is unlawful in the UK, yet tech giants like Meta are operating in the UK without sufficient enquiry being made into their practices and those of their parent companies. Authors are almost powerless given the enormous cost and complexities of pursuing litigation against corporate defendants with such deep pockets. We call upon you and the UK Government to take all action available to ensure that the rights, interests and livelihoods of authors are adequately protected. Failure to act without further delay will unquestionably have a catastrophic and irreversible impact on all UK authors given that from development through to output, creators’ rights are being systematically and repeatedly ignored.

If, as you say, your Government is serious about supporting authors as part of its Creative Industry Sector Plan, and its ambition to grow and protect the UK’s world-leading creative industries which contribute £126 billion a year to the UK’s GVA, it must demonstrate its commitment and stand up against the unethical and illegal practices of tech giants, which have such a devasting impact on the lives of UK authors. 

We, the undersigned, call on the Secretary of State to intervene by summoning senior executives of Meta to appear before Parliament. They must be required to provide a detailed response to the allegations that they have engaged in wholesale copyright infringement and to provide unequivocal assurances that they will respect the copyright of authors, not engage in unlawful conduct and will pay authors for all historic infringements.

 

Signed by:-

Anna Ganley, Chief Executive

Vanessa Fox O'Loughlin/Sam Blake, Management Committee Chair           

AJ West

Richard Osman 

Vaseem Khan

Lindsey Davis

Charles Harris 

Hilary Spurling

Daniel Hahn 

Sarah Waters

Val McDermid

Judy Garton-Sprenger 

Sir Kazuo Ishiguro 

Sir Tom Stoppard

Joanne Harris 

Julia Williams 

William Horwood

Harriet Evans

Paula Hawkins

Juliet McKenna

Gwyneth Lewis

Philip Womack 

Kate Mosse

1,029 people signed today

44,154


Decision-Makers

The Supporters

Featured Comments

Avatar of Lisa
Lisa, Coventry
2 weeks ago
I've been writing since I was ten. I was told it was not an economically stable profession unless you hit it big and got lucky, so I did what I was supposed to. I went to university. I got an engineering job so I could continue to create without needing to worry, to be afraid of where the money would come from for me to eek out a meagre existence. And still, I find myself afraid. Not only now do I need to worry about the fact that, should I ever publish, I likely will just be doing it for the love of creating and will incur a monetary loss overall, but now companies will profit from my hard work, from the money I spend to polish my manuscript. Anything I produce will be drowned out by the thousands of AI generated slop fests that are frankensteined from real people's effort. Anything I produce will be ripped from me and chopped up and fed into the machine. Authors across the globe pour their heart and soul into their projects only for companies that could very easily seek to compensate us for our work to spit in our faces. Instead they steal, and then when confronted hold up their hands and claim there was nothing else they could have done. Meanwhile while creatives struggle, these thieves grow richer and richer. How is that fair?
Avatar of Katrina
Katrina, Penzance
2 weeks ago
This is stealing. These are our words. I feel really angry about AI companies stealing our work. It has to stop & writers have to be compensated. Katrina Naomi poet
Avatar of Alma
Alma, Belingham
2 weeks ago
as an author who has recently hd ALL OF MY WORK stolen in order to "train" Meta's AI... I am furious, and more and more of my colleagues are expressing sentiments about not even knowing why they bother publishing anything any more seeing as they barely make anything from their work and it just get stolen to make someone ELSE money...

Featured Videos

avatar

Sign and share why you care!

Petition updates

Share this petition

Share this petition in person or use the QR code for your own material.Download QR Code
Petition created on 27 March 2025