By Stephen Downes
August 29, 2003
Personal and Collaborative Publishing:
Facilitating the Advancement of Online Communication and
Expression Within a University
PCP "is the
system by which an individual or group of individuals can
simply own and publish to a web space." The most
straightforward example of PCP is the weblog, but many
other examples (such as wikis) exist. This article is an
analysis of the phenomenon, and especially the manner in
which people interact using PCP. After describing PCPs,
whis short paper provides several examples showing how PCP
can facilitate communication in a university. I like this
paper, but honestly, I prefer the raw blog entry from which it was spawned.
By James Farmer, James Farmer's Radio Weblog, August 29,
2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Cut-and-Paste, Turn It In -- You Call That
Cheating?
According to this article, "Nearly 40
percent of college students have plagiarized papers by
using the cut-and-paste function on their computers to lift
text from the Internet, according to a new nationwide
cheating study." The definition of plagiarism (apparently)
used is "by either paraphrasing or copying a few sentences
of material off the Internet without citing the source." It
should be no surprise that "Business majors admitted to the
most cheating, with 63 percent saying they cheated at least
once in the last year." Interestingly, the report takes
care not to blame the internet for the cheating. "If
students did not have computers, they would find some other
way to cheat, McCabe said." (Note: this article has a sort
of log-in screen, but if you just click 'Outside The US'
you are taken straight in...) By Kelly Heyboer, New Jersey
Star-Ledger, August 28, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Dollar Benefits of E-Learning
The
evidence is this: "We launched a complex product a year
ago, and we found that sales folks who'd completed all four
e-learning modules had sold 25 units in a 30 day period
while those who hadn't averaged 17 units in the same period
of time." Sales folk? Oh well. Anyhow, by "those that
dan't" do they mean "didn't receive elearning" or "didn't
receive any learning at all?" The latter would certainly
explain the difference. But it also raises the question:
was the cost of providing the learning greater than the net
earnings from the increased sales? Ah, but this article
doesn't say. And I so ask: what good is an article that
fails even the slightest scrutiny? By Demir Barlas, Line
56, August 29, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
The Iron Fist, The Invisible Hand, And The
Battle For The Soul of Open Source
Bruce
Sterling warns, "The denizens of Open Cultures want their
connected collectivism to liberate the world from
regulations, markets, and intellectual property. But what
if victory only clears the way for corruption of their
beloved culture?" But aside from the limp observation that
a gangster won't be receiving any money for recording an
average album, I don't see the grim consequences here.
Where is the corruption: the previous, royalty-driven world
would have made sure the gangsters were paid.
Sterling writes, "When I listen to Ceca, I have to wonder
what dark passions and ancient evils have been held in
check by the grim totalitarianism of the profit motive. We
may yet find out." Well, yeah. But compared to what the
profit motive has historically unleashed, I don't think we
have much to worry about. By Bruce Sterling, Wired,
September, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
The EU Fight Against Yuck
ePatents
More coverage, with links to several
articles and discussion (of varying quality) following.
Many sites shut down this week to protest the
pending legislation, which would give Europe U.S.-style
technology patents, more than 600 sites in all. Update: the
decision has been postponed. By Lawrence Lessig, Lessig
Blog, August 29, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
RSS to replace email? Nah.
Jon
Udell expresses doubt that RSS will replace email. His mail
argument is that his current combination of spam filters
work fine (though his email account is groaning under the
volume). "It would be nuts," he writes, "to throw out the
SMTP baby with the spam bathwater," though some tweaking
(to verify that the sender is allow to send from that
address) amy be needed. I don't agree, and here's why. In
general, it seems to me, technologies that allow other
people to put content into your space are unstable.
On the other hand, technologies that allow you to
get what you want from remote locations have been
much more successful. SMTP is a put-type technology,
while RSS is a get-type technology. It doesn't mean
that RSS will replace email. But something will. By Jon
Udell, Jon Udell's Weblog, August 29, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Know a friend who might enjoy this
newsletter?
Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you
received this issue from a friend and would like a free
subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list
at
http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/website/subscribe.cgi
[
About This NewsLetter] [
OLDaily Archives]
[
Send me your comments]