By Stephen Downes
December 1, 2003
Sharing and Stealing
Litman argues
convincingly that "One of the most salient lessons from the
copyright wars of the last few years is that if express
permission is required before one can post a
collection of anything on the Internet, one will be unable
to do it." Quite right, which is why such a requirement
would destroy the internet. Moreover, "Thirty years ago,
when you saw something you wanted to use or share, the
default rule was that you were entitled to do so."
Copyright rules have changed, and in such a way as to make
it almost impossible to obtain copyright clearance in order
to share. The world of music shows us what a world of
strong copyright would be like, and what we could obtain
under a different regime. "The promise of being able to
find music that is
not available in stores, and to share it with other
consumers, in contrast, is compelling." The solution
proposed is much what I would endorse: people who own
copyrighted materials should 'opt out' of using systems set
up for free information sharing. use your own formats (the
author suggests a .drm format), use your own network. Quit
trying to turn the entire network into your private
distribution channel! By Jessica Litman, November, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
MIT Plans To Shut Part Of Campus
Temporarily
When institutions such as MIT begin
to have budget problems, you know the system is groaning
and creaking at the joints. And MIT's issues may be more
significant than they let on: the university "will shut
down part of its campus over the holidays, cut spending and
eliminate hundreds of jobs to close a looming budget
shortfall blamed on higher expenses and lower-than-expected
returns on its endowment. The university has asked staff
and students to save costs in small ways, such as turning
down the heat, using e-mail instead of regular mail,
bringing brown-bag lunches to departmental meetings, and
writing fewer checks, which cost 70 cents each." Brown-bag
lunches to departmental meetings? How the mighty have
fallen. By Associated Press, The Day, November 30, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Adobe Says LiveMotion is
Dead
Here's another reason to opt for open
source: you won't be left in the lurch like this. "Adobe
will no longer be selling LiveMotion 2.0 and will end
technical support of the product in March." Surprise! Hope
you didn't invest too much in this turkey. By Joanne
Cummings, StreamingMediaIQ, November 24, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Asian Pirates Sell Microsoft's Next Windows
System
They gave away copies of the new Longhorn
operating system like popcorn at the recent PDC conference, but somehow the problem
of software piracy is being caused by Asian sales of the
preview release? Give me a break. This is nothing more than
the fostering of xenophobia, propaganda of the worst kind.
By Unknown, Reuters, December 1, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
COOL
School
Joe wrote to me with the following
announcement: "A group of school districts in British
Columbia formed a consortium to
develop and share resources for online delivery. Over the
last year we have been working on developing a Learning
Object Repository. We have the repository working and have
a few learning objects in it. We defined a learning object
as a lesson. Within the learning objects are learning
assets (could stand alone). In the next few months we will
be adding a couple of hundred lessons to the repository.
The lessons are available for teachers or students to view.
By Various Authors, December 1, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Look Out, Outlook: RSS Ahead in
2004
Steve Gillmor predicts big things for RSS
in 2004:
- Metadata-driven directories that dynamically create RSS
feeds based on affinity
- Virtual conferences
- IM/RSS presence networks for rich collaboration and
e-mail replacement
- Content-generation tools based on small, routable XHTML
objects
- A DRM network with enough creative and hardware support
to blunt the Microsoft/RIAA DRM threat to peer-to-peer port
hijacking.
These are pretty safe predictions; we are working on most
of these here at NRC. By Steve Gillmor, eWeek, November 28,
2003
[
Refer][
Research][
Reflect]
Redefining 'Open Access'
This
article looks at the increasingly difficult task of
providing a community college education for everyone, and
solves that problem with a little semantic subterfuge,
redefining the meaning of 'open access': "To be true to
their mission, community colleges must serve all segments,
but not all members, of society." Nobody, of course, will
be fooled by this, and calling the resulting system 'open
access' is the basest sort of intellectual dishonesty. By
George B. Vaughan, Chronicle of Higher Education, December
5, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
What to Look for in '04
Fairly
routine set of technology predictions for 2004 - who says
you can't predict the future? But the best of the bunch is
this: IP addressable Smart Boards (or their equivalent).
The idea is this: your large screen display needs to be
plugged and unplugged every time you want to switch
computers. But why can't you just send your screen output
to the board over the internet? Next year, you will be able
to with the new systems. By Phillip D. Long, Syllabus,
December 1, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Know a friend who might enjoy this
newsletter?
Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you
received this issue from a friend and would like a free
subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list
at
http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/website/subscribe.cgi
[
About This NewsLetter] [
OLDaily Archives]
[
Send me your comments]