By Stephen Downes
January 12, 2004
Vancouver...
By Stephen Downes, OLDaily, January 12, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Canadian Elearning Workshop
2004
Good coverage of today's Elearning workshop
in Vancouver, including my own talk this morning. The
meeting is a summary of projects funded by CANARIE,
including our own eduSource project. By Raymond Yee,
Raymond Yee's Wiki, January 12, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Depth and Superficiality: E-learning and
Global Culture
Outline and link to a
presentation looking at the impact of culture on
e-learning. The author argues that while most e-learning
today merely presents content, such e-learning will not
produce a lot of change in the learner and will need
eventually to be replaced with new, "deep", technology. But
such deep technology is much more senstitive to cultural
variation, and no methodologies yet exist to take this into
account. By Patrick Dunn, Viral-learning.net, January 12,
2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Wem gehört die Mona Lisa?
The English translation of this article is a
bit rough, but you can get the meaning: though the image of
the Mona Lisa has long since passed into the public domain,
a new sort of property has been created by restricting who
can photograph the artwork, then copyrighting the photos.
So who owns the (image of) the Mona Lisa? Bill Gates. "It
is to a certain extent a parasite, which wants to push out
the delimitation of the copyright protection..." By Rita
Gudermann, Wirtschaft, January 8, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Babel's Children
Fans of Star Trek
are familiar with the Tamarians, a species that speaks
entirely in metaphor (for more, see the The Darmok Dictionary). We use metaphor
in English, but the bulk of our communication is of the
noun-verb construction. This, too, is the form of metadata
languages such as RDF. But some languages, such as Riau
Indonesian, do not distinguish between noun and verb. The
question raised in this article is whether our forms of
linguistic contruction inform how we think. Or does how we
think determine how we form languages? To me, this question
is interesting because I postulate that multi-media is a
post-grammatical language. If such a language in fact is
possible, then if the first theory is correct, then it
should change how those fluent in multimedia think. But if
the latter thesis is correct, then it is much less likely
that a multimedia language could exist at all. By Unknown,
The Economist, January 8, 2003
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
21CIF Self-Guided
MicroModules
This is a useful resource that has
some good features. It is a page of short, self contained
modules addressing specific concepts in information
literacy. They are thus good examples of reusable
resources. I found, however, the pretest to be annoying -
there was no way to get around the form, even on my second
visit. Still, designers should at least have a look at this
site as an instance of somethinmg that is on the right
track. Their next step should be this: create an RSS index
contain learning metadata and make these resources
available to the wider community. By Various Authors,
Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, January, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Know a friend who might enjoy this
newsletter?
Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you
received this issue from a friend and would like a free
subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list
at
http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/website/subscribe.cgi
[
About This NewsLetter] [
OLDaily Archives]
[
Send me your comments]