By Stephen Downes
December 7, 2004
A Typology of Virtual Communities:
A Multi-Disciplinary Foundation for Future
Research
I'm not really a big fan of
taxonomies - their main use seems to be to give professors
something to name after themselves. A taxonomy - being an
organization of entities by keying on particular properties
- is always relative to a use (and one would hope - but not
always find - the properties relevant to the use). The only
use identified for this particular taxonomy is that it is
"useful to researchers who seek to pursue programmatic
research and theoretical advancement from a variety of
disciplinary areas," and is is so by virtue of being simple
and universally applicable (or so says the author). It
would help researchers form research questions. But (in my
mind) not very good ones - we could ask, 'Does a member
initiated or commercially sponsored community better foster
collaboration?' And maybe even get an answer. But does
being member initiated (say) cause collaboration?
What would it be to even ask the question? Either the
answer is contained in the taxonomy, or the taxonomy is
meaningless to the research. Either way, there doesn't seem
to be much point. Via Distance-Educator.com. By Constance
Elise Porter, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication ,
November, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
The Semantic Web, Digital Identity, and
Internet Governance
Some observations on
digital identity. I agree with this bit: "having spent more
hours than I care to admit poring over specs and
architecture diagrams from the Passport, Shibboleth,
Liberty, and WS-Federation projects, I suspect (as does Doc
Searls) that some other identity standard will prevail."
But what? SxIP? Identity
Commons? That we would have to choose one of these
indicates a flaw. That we would have to pay money to have
an identity indicates another. I've thought about this too.
And it seems to me that, in the end, I will need to have
something of mine (that I control, that only I can
use) that vouches for my identity. If I have to depend on
some central server - well, that's not the answer. because
Jon Udell is right - if it has to be governed, we
haven't done it right. By Jon Udell, Jon Udell's Weblog,
December 7, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Thunderbird
Thunderbird 1.0 is a
go - which means I can upgrade now from Thunderbird 0.3,
which I've been using for the last year or so (Thunderbird
is the Mozilla-based email client - just like Outlook (but
without the calendar - that's Sunbird
- still in development), except it won't leak viruses or
send spam to all your friends). By Various Authors,
December 7, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Blink
Some people call it
intuition. Some people call it making a snap judgement.
Whatever it's called, it seems clear that the human mind
has the capacity to reach correct decisions quickly on the
basis of very little information. Well - decision, at any
rate. Not always correct; it depends on the circumstances.
The thing is, the same capacity that makes people
suspicious of me because of my long hair is what lets
doctors diagnose heart attacks on the spin of a dime.
Anyhow, this item is a preview of a book about that
phenomenon. I don't typically do book previews (so please
don't start asking), but I liked the write-up. Via
elearningpost.
By Malcolm Gladwell, December 5, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
College Board Wants SAT Statistics Taken Off
Web Site
Fair use or copyright violation? A
group critical of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) has
posted results showing that minority and poor applicants
scored lower than white and upper-class kids. The College
Board, which owns the SAT, is demanding that the
information be removed from the FairTest website,
arguing that it violates copyright. The College Board
should either create better tests, live with the criticism,
or get out of the game; misusing copyright to squelch
criticism isn't fair ball. Via University Business. Another
report from the New York Times. By Ken Maguire,
Associated Press, December 5, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
College Libraries: the Long
Goodbye
Whatever replaces the library must be
some kind of library, and that whatever replaces the book
must be some kind of book. So it seems after reading this
article, one in which the writer, a lover of libraries,
comes to grips with the decline of the library (and appears
to have moved into Stage Seven: Acceptance). But of course
there's no reason to expet that online knowledge of the
future will resemble the book and the library. But not
everybody's ready for that yet. By Dennis Dillon, Chronicle
of Higher Education, December 10, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Contrarian Finding: Computers are a Drag on
Learning
Short article describing the Woessmann
and Fuchs report on the impact of computers in
learning. Some good bits:a reference to a school that
doesn't use computers until grade 11, an unrelated comment
by Todd Oppenheimer, and a zinger by Chris Dede: "Can you
imagine what would happen if you had the same in business,
asking if computers were interfering with performance? It
would be a big joke." By G. Jeffrey MacDonald, Christian
Science Monitor, December 6, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Blogs, Tomorrow's Learning, and Why I
Blog
Nice post that puts some pieces together,
linking some motivtions for blogging with the idea of self
directed learning with an observation on the range of
learning available online, from the playfulness of Slashdot
to the dedicated seriousness of an MIT course. The author
writes, "What we each need to learn is idiosyncratic. The
trappings of formal learning environments need to be
approached with extreme caution. Learning needs to get back
to play to succeed." By Jim McGee, McGee's Musings,
December 6, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Remember...
[Refer] - send an item to your friends
[Research] - find related items
[Reflect] - post a comment about this item
Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter?
Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list at http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/website/subscribe.cgi
[About This NewsLetter] [OLDaily Archives] [Send me your comments]
Copyright © 2004 Stephen Downes
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.