By Stephen Downes
February 25, 2005
Markdown
Sweet. A free and open
source Perl script that translates ordinary text into
correct HTML or XHTML. Works a lot like a wiki script,
except that it can function as a plug-in for Moveable Type,
Blosxom, or BBEdit (along with, presumably, your home grown
Perl programs). I can't wait to play with it. There's also
a PHP
port by Michel Fortin. And an HTML to (Markdown style)
text, by Aaron
Schwartz. By John Gruber, Daring Fireball, December 17,
2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Report Faults Bush Initiative on
Education
A report tabled yesterday by a
bipartisan panel of legislators condemns the No Child Left
Behind Act, calling it "a flawed, convoluted and
unconstitutional education reform initiative that had
usurped state and local control of public schools." This
New York article also cites criticisms of the report by a
representative from the Business
Roundtable.
Perhaps some perspective, as offered by Will Richardson as he cites Ted Sizer from The Red Pencil: "The best predictor of a child's educational success always has been and still is the economic and social class of his family rather than the school that he or she happens to attend. The schools as they presently function appear, save at the well publicized margins, rarely to countervail the accidents of family, wealth and residence. 'Success,' as conventionally defined, and ultimately graduation thus depend largely on the chance of birth and income, embarrassing a democracy that pretends to offer equal educational opportunities for all." By Sam Dillon, New York Times, February 25, 2005 [Refer][Research][Reflect]
The
Odeo Blog
Odeo is supposed to launch today at
TED. It will make podcasting simpler. As I write, it hasn't
launched yet, so all we have is this blog. But keep an eye out. By Evan Williams,
February 25, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
How Dr. Papadakis Runs a Drexel University
Like a Company
I'm not going to say that
everything Drexel University president Constantine
Papadakis has done is wrong, because that would be in
error. Nor will I hard on this Philadelphia University's
poor rankings in national surveys, because I don't think
these surveys are really accurate measures. There's a lot
to like in Drexel's methodology, but there's also a lot to
dislike. Running a school like a business sometimes means
running it into the ground; in business, after all,
failures are common. Schools don't have that luxury. And
running it like a business means running it with more
attention to the bottom line than to the product, which in
the field of education is also a concern. Right now, I
think, it's pretty easy to look at a traditional university
and cherry-pick significant savings (though usually at the
risk of outraging faculty). But being smart is not a
synonym for being a business, and we should not fool
ourselves into believing it is. By Bernard Wysocki Jr.,
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, February 24, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Thar's Gold in Them Thar Voucher
Schools!
"A private investment firm that owns
the largest ice manufacturer in the United States, makes
plus-sized clothes and oversees a leading cabinet company
has been educating Florida's disabled students — and doing
it with taxpayer dollars." Kim Cavanaugh asks, "On how many
levels is this wrong?" As he describes the policy, "Let's
pull the money out of the public system, give it to
entrepreneurs, and let the marketplace decide." I have to
agree - it's really hard to see the company's primary
motivation as being the welfare of its students. By Kim
Cavanaugh, Brain Frieze, February 21, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Knowledge Management Systems
George Siemens links to this useful course outline
linking to numerous useful works on knowledge management.
He comments, "When an instructor puts a course like this
online (as compared to a password-protected LMS), many
people benefit (and the institution doesn't really lose
anything by sharing)." Quite right. Now what would have
been really great is a podcast consisting of the
professors' lectures. But maybe that's asking too much. By
Don Turnbull, School of Information, The University of
Texas at Austin, Spring, 2004
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
A Little More on DRM
A recent
paper from the Cato Institute has drawn the ire of
copyright activists as it insists that while governments
should continue to protect the "property rights" of
copyright holders, market solutions should be allowed to
define the integration of digital rights management (DRM)
with peer to peer (P2P) file sharing technologies. But as
Ed Felten points
out, "the theory works, of course, only if the music
business really is competitive. If the record companies act
as a cartel, they can use the resulting monopoly power to
dictate the design of DRM systems, regardless of consumer
preferences." And he also
argues that it's "not clear that we can rely on the DRM
vendors to make their products interoperable -- they have
little incentive to help their customers switch to
competitors' products." Indeed, I would observe that the
primary free market response has been to call on government
for more restrictive legislation and harsher penalties
while at the same time building technology that doesn't
work and reducing the range and quality of commercial
offerings. This business of pretending that some forms of
government intervention are in reality forms of the free
market while others are nothing more than communism - it's
got to stop. By Derek Slater, A Copyfighter's Musings,
February 21, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Global Digital Divide Narrowing
The global digital divide is rapidly closing, asserts the
World Bank, which then uses this information to criticize a
United Nations program to increase usage and access to
technology in poorer nations. But the digital divide is still
significant and so I don't see how evidence that these
programs are successful could be an argument for
terminating them - but then again, the World Bank has never
really impressed me with its reasoning. By Unattributed,
BBC News, February 24, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Revenge of the Blog People!
American Library Association president Michael Gorman has
spoken again, this time asserting that "the Blog People
read what they want to read rather than what is in front of
them and judge me to be wrong on the basis of what they
think rather than what I actually wrote." Gorman, recall,
argued
that "Massive databases of digitized whole books,
especially scholarly books, are expensive exercises in
futility..." He now writes that he is not against
digitization, but "that I do not believe this particular
project will give us anything that comes anywhere near
access to the world's knowledge," mostly because Google
does not deliver well ordered search results. What would be
better? "If a fraction of the latter were devoted to buying
books and providing librarians for the library-starved
children of California, the effort would be of far more use
to humanity and society." Yes, indeed, let's feed the
starving Californians; that would be much better. Sheesh.
By Michael Gorman, Library Journal, February 15, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Government 2.0 Slammed
I am
supportive of the idea of decentralizing government, but
not at the expense of placing governance into the hands of
undemocratic institutions. I have often made the point that
no society is democratic until its institutions are
democratic. Its institutions include things like government
agencies, corporations, NGOs and non-profits, schools and
universities, and the like. Most of these are in no way
democratic, and so by this definition we are a long way
from democracy. And we would be even further away from
democracy were we to put governance into the hands of these
institutions, as suggested in William Eggers's Government
2.0. So I am sympathetic with the criticisms outlined in
this link. By Ross Mayfield, Ross Mayfield's Weblog,
February 24, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Remember...
[Refer] - send an item to your friends
[Research] - find related items
[Reflect] - post a comment about this item
Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter?
Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list at http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/website/subscribe.cgi
[About This NewsLetter] [OLDaily Archives] [Send me your comments]
Copyright © 2005 Stephen Downes
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.