By Stephen Downes
June 22, 2005
Skype Recordings as Learning
Resources?
Skype would be just great for
creating learning resources, but Skype doesn't have a
recording tool. So how to so it? The winner, according to
Derek Morrison, is SAM - "Alex Rosenbaum's SAM (Skype
Answering Machine) is a brilliantly simple but,
neverthelss, very useful tool which becomes a 'listener'
for incoming Skype calls and intercepts them." This article
explains all. By Derek Morrison, Auricle, June 21, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Microsoft works on own BitTorrent
I don't know, I just find it ironic when I read items
like this to think of how much Microsoft complains about
piracy and digital rights and all that other stuff intended
to protect the creators of ideas and innovation.
BitTorrent, of course, is intended to be crushed like a bug
under Microsoft's, um, innovative foot. By
Unattributed, BBC News, June 20, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Wide Open: Open Mource Methods and Their
Future Potential
Worth a look is this article
on open source and open publishing, which while it covers
well trodden ground, writes Scott Leslie, "it's great to
see it taken up by 'think
tanks' such as this which hopefully have an influence on
government and other policy." Quite so, and readers may
find a number of interesting and surprising examples of
open methods in the substantial third appendix. By
Geoff Mulgan, Omar Salem and Tom Steinberg , Demos, June,
2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Playing to Learn
Doug levin
sends in this link from the latest issue of Cable
in the Classroom, now available. Some good insight into
how games should be supported. Games require media
literacy, for example - they are not real, should not be
taken as real, and players need to be able to recognize
that. Games can also require support - they may require
background knowledge or experience, and players may need to
be pointed in the right direction (or designers should make
it available inside the game itself). By Eric Klopfer,
Cable in the Classroom, July/August, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Where Now for Collaborative
Journalism?
I'll give them credit for trying.
The Los Angeles Times attempted to include readers in their
online content by setting up a wiki where readers could
rewrite the day's editorial. The experiment lasted one day,
and then was pulled, as they said, "due to defacement."
This analysis summarizes pretty well what happened. First,
when they introduced the wiki, "the focus was on the Times
and The Law, not the readers and contributors." Second,
"editors seeded the wiki -- a tool designed for
collaboration -- with one of the most divisive 'news' topic
possible (the Iraq war)." Third, "wikis need a community of
passionate and involved netizens" and the Times didn't have
such a committee nor did they try to create one. Fourth,
perhaps they should have required logins. And finally, why
use a wiki to "reply" at all - comments can do that. By
Kathy Gill, About.com, June 21, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Building a Community of Practice
It may look like just another blog, but check out the
list of links in the lower right hand column, where you
will find transcripts of numerous conversations and
interviews, including one with Graham
Stanley introducing podcasting. By Numerous Authors,
June, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Digital Debacle
Students at the
University of Maryland write, "The university's decision to
extend Cdigix's trial does not offer students a genuine
alternative to illegally pirated media." The system works
only on Internet Explorer. It won't allow downloads to,
say, iPods. People aren't using it. "With few Cdigix
supporters, it seems like a shameful waste of money." By
Editorial, Digital Diamondback, June 16, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Publishers' Group Asks Google to Stop
Scanning Copyrighted Works for 6 Months
As
this article describes it, "The Association of American
Publishers has asked Google to stop scanning copyrighted
books published by the association's members for at least
six months while the company answers questions about
whether its plan to scan millions of volumes in five major
research libraries complies with copyright law." While
they're at it, why don't they ask the public to stop buying
and reading their books too, in case our having a permanent
and portable copy of their work - a sharable
technology - is somehow also in contravention. By Jeffrey
R. Young, Chronicle of Higher Education, June 21, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
WebCT Campus Edition 6: Frequently Asked
Questions
Karen Gage, Senior VP of Marketing
for WebCT writes (this is the full email, not edited in any
way, except to place the link provided under the heading
instead of in the text): "I wanted to alert you to some
inaccurate or misleading information that you passed on in
OLDaily yesterday in your piece on 'WebCT Price Increases'.
WebCT customers who license our Campus Edition product are
entitled to upgrade from v.4 to CE 6.0 without additional
WebCT license fees. We don't license our product by the
version. We sell an annual license for Campus Edition, and
it is the customer's choice about which version they choose
to implement. It is the same price whether they run CE 4 or
upgrade to CE 6. I don't know the situations of the unnamed
institutions that reported price changes to you. Perhaps
they are expanding the number of licensed users? We have an
FAQ about upgrading to CE 6 that might be a more useful
link than to the CE homepage.
License fees are such an important issue. Will you be able
to provide an update to your readers?" By Karen Gage,
WebCT, June 22, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Remember...
[Refer] - send an item to your friends
[Research] - find related items
[Reflect] - post a comment about this item
Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter?
Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list at http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/website/subscribe.cgi
[About This NewsLetter] [OLDaily Archives] [Send me your comments]
Copyright © 2005 Stephen Downes
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.