By Stephen Downes
July 21, 2005
A Networked, Media-Rich Programming
Environment...
There's a lot here, but follow
this line of thinking: imagine that there is a language,
but instead of words, this language is made up of small
computer programs called 'blocks'. Imagine that these
blocks can be combined to express thoughts. And that they
don't just have to be organized in a sequence, but can be
set up in patterns, inserted into common appliances, used,
indeed, anywhere we might use a word today. Imagine a
network that allows people to automatically send and
receive blocks in predefined configurations and places.
OK, this, or at least part of this, is the world of Scratch, a concept advanced by Mitchel Resnick and his colleagues. The blocks are available ready-made for kids, who in turn can arrange them (visually) to create larger functioning wholes. It is also the way I have always thought of learning objects, at least, before the publishing industry got a hold of them and made them like bits of a textbook. Scratch will be written in Squeak, an open-source implementation of the Smalltalk-80 language. I had always thought (and still think) they should be written in a form of XML (and to that end have been following developments in o:XML for the last year or so.
Still. Scratch is what I've always looked for in learning objects. Building-block programming. Programmable manipulation of rich media. Deep shareability. Seamless integration with the physical world. Support for multiple languages. And not a learning outcome or multiple-choice test in sight. And I have alwaqys thought of RSS and similar formats - aqnd the RSS content network, with associated formats, as being the medium in which a Scratch-type language would be spoken. By students to students.
Via Will Richardson, who offers more discussion and links. By Mitchel Resnick, Yasmin Kafai and John Maeda, BLC05, July, 2005 [Refer][Research][Reflect]
Understanding the Greasemonkey
Vulnerability
If you haven't heard,
Greasmonkey - a Firefox extension that allows you to write
DHTML scripts that apply on remote pages - was discovered
to have a major vulnerability. Never exploited (it was
discivewred by Greasmonkey developers themselves) it is
nonetheless serious enough to require that all Greasemonkey
users update immediately. This article explains the
vulnerability - and gives you an idea just how complex
client-side scripting can be. By Simon Willison, Simon
Willison's Weblog, July 20, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Introducing IMS ePortfolio
Two
parts (Part
one, Part
two) of a description of the IMS e-portfolio
specification (a third part ios forthcoming), clearly
written and offering a depth of understanding. And while I
appreciate the explanation of how IMS creates
specifications, I still think this is the wrong way to do
it: "the whole process, from charter to final
specification, can take place with (a) No actual
implementations to test whether the spec works and (b) No
initial submissions of existing implementations to start
things off." Or as I've said of LOM, it was written by
people who never had to parse the documents for a living.
By Scott Wilson, Scott's Workblog, July 18-19, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Students Say High Schools Let Them
Down
Well I may as well link to the new York
Times article; everyone else has. I like Jeremy
Hiebert's take: "What interests me about these kinds of
articles is the lack of vision for what might work better
-- usually the only idea is to raise standards and test
more aggressively, but when are people going to realize
that it's not working?" By Michael Janofsky, New York
Times, July 16, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Persistent Identity (or not)
Nils Peterson looks at the question of persistent
identity - picking up from my commentary on Catherine
Howell's reply to Andrew Middleton. He asks, "how do I know
that 'fratboy' on aol and 'cougar21' at Washington State
University are the same individual?" Well, fair enough -
and one would think that if 'fratboy' said "I am Nils
Peterson" and 'cougar21' said "I am Nils Peterson" that
this should be good enough. Or more to the point - as good
as you're going to get. Importantly, "for each of a
person's communities of discourse a different (but stable)
identity might be workable, and also a way that multiple
identities, with varying levels of persistence, can be
woven together to provide a picture of a single individual
across communities." By Nils Peterson, July 21, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
What Mean Ye Collaboration Tools?
Alan Levine and I will be joining Philip Long at the EDUCAUSE Seminars on
Academic Computing (SAC) in a couple of weeks. We are
jointly presenting a seminar on collaboration technologies.
The idea is "more than just demmo-ing and gloating about
the tools, what the interesting things done with them?" By
Alan Levine, CogDogBlog, July 20, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Beyond the Horseless Carriage: Harnessing the
potential of ICT in education and training
Written in April and released some time later (the first
blog cite is from elearnopedia June
30, which I missed, and then just today in elearnspace
- they should add RSS to this
page), this paper, written by the CEO of education.au,
is more important for the direction it signals than what it
says. Citing observations that education has lagged in the
adoption of thechnology, the author suggests that "a new
theory of learning, to provide a pedagogical framework for
the digital age which is based on connectedness, is
required urgently." George Siemens's Connectivism,
an approach I
also support, is cited favorably in this regard. By
Gerry White, education.au, April 4, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect]
Remember...
[Refer] - send an item to your friends
[Research] - find related items
[Reflect] - post a comment about this item
Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter?
Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list at http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/website/subscribe.cgi
[About This NewsLetter] [OLDaily Archives] [Send me your comments]
Copyright © 2005 Stephen Downes
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.