OLDaily

Welcome to Online Learning Daily, your best source for news and commentary about learning technology, new media, and related topics.

OER24: Gathering Courage
Lorna Campbell, Open World, 2024/04/04

---

Lorna Campbell summarizes the open educational resources conference from last week in Ireland. If I can be a curmudgeon for a moment, let me say I can remember when it was about open learning and open resources, not a grab-bag of all the social justice and ethics issues there are in the world. Don't get me wrong; I actually support a progressive stance on most of these matters (I'm not that much of a curmudgeon). But the internet is not dead, there is still some justice out there, and for many in the world things are getting better, not worse. We are doing some good. Let's not forget that. We need empowerment, not direction. We need resources, not tenets. We don't need to be told what's right and what's good. We already know, each of us. The hard work of discovery, creativity, industry and cooperation is what lies ahead. Let's put aside the pulpits and put down our pamphlets and pick up our tools, and build the world we want to see.

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]

Exploring influential factors in peer upvoting within social annotation
Xiaoshan Huang, Shan Li, Lijia Lin, Fu Chen, 2024/04/04

---

I'm always pretty sceptical of the practitioner notes 'what is already known about this topic' segment. For example, here we read that "No study has explored the influential factors in peer upvoting within social annotation-based learning." A quick look at Google Scholar says otherwise. And anyways, how could this be true when the previous 'what is already known' states, "receiving upvotes from peers is not only a type of feedback but also a form of motivation, social interaction and social validation." How could we know this if there were no studies? We also read, "This study was the first to examine social annotations through the lens of the community of inquiry framework." But again, Google Scholar provides the counterexamples. Instead of journals forcing these stilted and often wrong 'practitioner notes' they should just let the authors write their papers and allow them to be taken at face value. The real question being studied here is "Are there any differences in cognitive and social presence between students receiving a high and low number of upvotes?" We don't need to artificially frame it. It's interesting enough on its own. 14 page PDF.

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]

A bibliometric analysis of the evolving mechanisms of shadow education research
Wang Weilin, Li Jun, European Journal of Education, 2024/04/04

---

As used here, 'shadow education' "usually indicates academic fee-paid tutoring administered outside schools." This paper (18 page PDF) overviews major sources and evolving themes in shadow educ ation research. "Theoretically," write the authors, with emphasis, "probably due to our selection criteria, influential articles along the major evolution path of the citation network mainly regard shadow education as a supplement to mainstream education." On the other hand, "shadow education may replace its mainstream counterpart because some students regard the former as more effective." This missing too much relevant literature (the authors even admit "the knowledge dissemination network of SER is likely to form a network closure").

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]

Substack Is Setting Writers Up For A Twitter-Style Implosion
Andrea Grimes, Home With The Armadillo, 2024/04/04

---

An increasing number of education writers are setting up on Substack - just as Substack is about to tank. "The Wrap details how Substack's decision to implement a new 'follow' feature...  Jeanna Kadlec wrote on Threads. 'Every writer I know is seeing our subscriptions plummet as our 'follower' count rises.'" The problem is that while subscribers sign up to an email list, followers have to stay on the Substack site to read content. Also, a subscriber list is portable, while a Substack follower list is not even visible to authors, let alone portable. It's all about making it difficult for writers to move (in the business world this is called 'lock in'). But once writers can't move, the squeeze begins... Via Dan Gillmor.

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]

We publish six to eight or so short posts every weekday linking to the best, most interesting and most important pieces of content in the field. Read more about what we cover. We also list papers and articles by Stephen Downes and his presentations from around the world.

There are many ways to read OLDaily; pick whatever works best for you:

• Read in your web browser on this web page, updated weekdays
• Receive a daily or weekly email newsletter by subscribing here
• Subscribe to the RSS feed using your favourite feed reader
• Follow @OLDaily@mastodon.social on Mastodon or elsewhere in the fediverse
• Follow @OLDaily on Twitter
• Integrate the open API using the JSON feed