Work 2026
Stephen Downes,
Stephen's Web,
2026/09/11
When you support OLDaily with a paid subscription, you're supporting more than just the daily newsletter people read in their email, social media or on the web. You're also supporting the various things I do in the background to stay current and to contribute to free and open learning generally. But how should I prioritize my time? I always have a number of projects on the go and it would be nice to get a sense of what people feel is valuable. You don't have to be a paid subscriber to participate. I want to hear from everybody (it would make me feel really good, in fact, to get a lot of replies). My survey tool won't collect your identities and won't stash any cookies in your browser - it's completely anonymous. Take the survey here.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
How Theories Arise
Gary Ackerman,
www.hackscience.education,
2026/09/11
Gary Ackerman writes that "theories are rules we should follow when designing educational technology systems." He then steps through the generation process in order to conclude, "After more studies have validated the theory, it may become established. This is when practitioners should begin using it. It is important for practitioners to wait until a theory is established before they begin to rely on it to guide decisions." In response, I note only that I have spent a lifetime arguing that rule-based systems are not appropriate for technology development or adoption (or most anything else really) and that a focus of developing theories as 'rules' would be very misplaced.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
Android Rolling Out Passkey Transfers Between Password Managers
BeauHD,
Slashdot,
2026/09/11
Interoperability is coming to password and passkey management (except, I guess, within the Apple world). Quoting directly from Slashdot: "Android is rolling out a system-level way to securely transfer passwords and passkeys between credential managers, eliminating the need to export passwords as unencrypted text files or manually recreate passkeys. The feature initially supports Google Password Manager, 1Password, Bitwarden, and Dashlane, with other providers able to integrate through Android's Credentials Transfer API." Important enough to me that I want to keep a record of this. Via Apostolos K.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
Two more newsrooms are suing OpenAI. It's complicated.
Ben Werdmuller,
2026/09/11
Ben Werdmuller summarizes his post: "publishers are suing AI vendors, accusing them of theft. But are they giving the creators responsible for building their value a fair deal?" Against his Mastodon post I commented, "A large proportion - maybe even most - content read and used by AI was written for no commercial purpose at all, for free, by people just interacting on the Internet... We can't write rules that block people from normal interaction just because some writers & publishers put a toll on the road." I would go further to observe that journalists themselves do the same thing AI does - they record and draw from documents and events in the world, curating and interpreting them to help us understand. The journalist never talks about compensating their subjects; nobody treats it as 'theft' when a photographer records an accident scene. The ethics of all this are a lot more complex than "author write, AI steal". The same is true with respect to academic literature and learning resources.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
Wendell Berry: Example, not Exemplar
John Warner,
The Biblioracle Recommends The Biblioracle Recommends,
2026/09/11
I was referred this from somewhere and I let it sit on my desktop for a few days while I revisited it and let it mature in my mind (I often do this with items; sometimes they make it to OLDaily a week or more after they were published and sometimes they never appear). It's a set of thoughts on Wendell Berry, who passed away recently. I hadn't heard of him before, but I find looking at this sort of thought interesting; it reminds me of Thoreau and also of a more thoughtful way to look at our interactions with technology and the world. There's a nice set of "standards for technological innovation in my own work" which reminds me of my own Nine Rules for Good Technology, but with a broader focus. The overall message, I think, is the idea of living deliberately - being thoughtful about what we accept and what we reject. The bulldozer story at the beginning of Berry's What are people for? is a good example of that, I think.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
How AI is Reshaping K-12 EdTech Procurement
Alex Sarlin, Ben Kornell, and Jen Lapaz,
Edtech Insiders,
2026/09/11
The real value of this article is the overview of research on K–12 procurement and adoption in the U.S. though the point is to discuss how AI informs, and AI procurement is informed by, this process. The in point (as I read it) is that it's hard for districts to get credible evidence from sources they trust to inform their decisions. The most trusted sources are reviews and recommendations from other districts, scientific research publications, and product reviews from blogs and forums. The risk is that depending on AI here reinforces weaknesses in the evidence they are using by altering it or substituting for it. "Foundational fixes stand to have a ripple effect that improve procurement outcomes: making formal evidence easier to access and trust, reducing certification clutter to clarify quality signals, building student voices directly into the EdTech evidence base, and establishing the guidance that teachers still lack."
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
Who pays the cost when Americans opt out of science?
Adam Frank,
Big Think,
2026/09/11
We should probably replace the word 'Americans' with the phrase 'a society' in the headline, because that's the argument Adam Frank is making. The first point is that science denial has nothing to do with science or even science communication. "Instead, it is about a kind of tribalism: If you identify as a member of certain groups - usually ones that have a particular political orientation - then you oppose certain kinds of science." The next point is that when one society begins to deny science, the frontiers of research (and the benefits that flow with it) flow elsewhere. "In the long run, the price you pay for science denial is the denial of your own scientific capacities."
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
There are many ways to read OLDaily; pick whatever works best for you:
- Read in your web browser on this web page, updated weekdays
- Receive a daily or weekly email newsletter by subscribing here
- Subscribe to the RSS feed using your favourite feed reader
- Follow @OLDaily@mastodon.social on Mastodon or elsewhere in the fediverse
- Follow @OLDaily on Bluesky
- Read OLDaily as a LinkedIn Newsletter
- Integrate the open API using the JSON feed
This newsletter is sent only at the request of subscribers. If you would like to unsubscribe, Click here.
Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter? Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list. Click here to subscribe.
Copyright 2026 Stephen Downes Contact: stephen@downes.ca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.