This is the third part of the series and reaches the same conclusion as the previous two: AI working with an expert produce the best result, AI with a novice the second best, and a human working without AI the worst. There's some pretty good analysis of how and why the AI+Expert combination works best, including the surprising conclusion that "respondents consistently associated what they valued most with expert human input, even when these elements were actually AI-generated." So far, reports Philippa Hardman, "AI is most powerful when used as a tool for augmentation, not automation." But I wonder whether it's only a matter of time before AI is superior at both.
Today: 0 Total: 17 [Direct link] [Share]
