According to this article, "at major computer-science publication venues, up to 17% of the peer reviews are now written by artificial intelligence." Of course, the detection of AI writing isn't totally reliable, but as James Zou writes, "reviews penned by AI tools stand out because of their formal tone and verbosity — traits commonly associated with the writing style of large language models (LLMs)." The article has the usual caveats that AI should not replace human reviewers and that "guardrails" should be in place. But "the tidal wave of LLM use in academic writing and peer review cannot be stopped." Via Daily Nous.
Today: 3 Total: 642 [Direct link] [Share]
