Due Diligence
Doug Johnson,
Blue Skunk Blog,
Oct 08, 2007
The filtering argument continues. Doug Johnson links to a defense of filtering from Kurt Paccio, who argues, "not one of those who sigh or are critical of filtering decisions has their job on the line should Johnny access inappropriate content. Would those who are frustrated sit beside me in court or defend me in the court of public opinion?" Johnson responds, "If schools are relying on filters (and tech staff) alone to protect students from inappropriate content, I hope the superintendent gets canned rather than the IT director." You can tell common sense has gone out the window when Paccio asserts, "It's sad but we live in a litigious society." The problem is, justice is inaccessible. It costs too much to defend oneself, and the costs of failure are too extreme. Even if the response is reasonable, the bullies win. Paccio cannot avoid being responsible for keeping all children completely isolated from questionable content, and he must show that he is taking some action, even if the only course open to him is an unreasonable one.
Today: 2 Total: 101 [Direct link] [Share]
