It was precisely on this sort of issue that I locked horns with my PhD supervisor so many years ago, a disagreement on the nature of the mental that would never be resolved to anyone's satisfaction. My sympathies lie with the critical reviewer of this book, who argues that problems underlying the 'structured Russellian propositions' view render the account, ultimately, incomprehensible.
Today: 0 Total: 11 [Direct link] [Share]
