It feels like the word 'rate' is being used in an odd way here? As though it means, 'to use'. Or, 'to rank as good'? No matter: it's an interesting article, no matter how you understand the word 'rate'. "So there we have it. Or them, rather. Reasons researchers really rate repositories: vast visibility, increased impact, worry-reduced workflow." This post was in response to a request from Les Carr for "a collection of success stories - anecdotes of how repositories have been able to improve the lot of researchers - for appealing to institutional repository nay-sayers and open access agnostics." Be sure to send in your stories.
Today: 7 Total: 97 [Direct link] [Share]
