Good talk explaining what's wrong with systems like Friendster and with makinking things explicit. It raisies issues I have touched on frequently over the last year. This quote is very important: "But here’s the problem: things aren’t about what they’re about. 'Aboutness' is also contextual and ambiguous. For example, if my blog entry on the JFK assassination links to the 1962 Sears catalog from which Oswald bought his rifle, the author of that catalog will not have labeled it as being about the JFK shooting. And if a scientist publishes a paper about a new polymer, she may in passing reject some closely related compound because it’s too sticky…but that may be exactly what you’re looking for. So, for you the article is about what the author tosses away in a footnote. Not to mention that in much of the best writing, about-ness is an emergent property. So, while the author’s intentions are an important clue, aboutness is ambiguous. Systems that too easily categorize and classify based upon a univocal idea of aboutness do violence to their topic."
Today: 6 Total: 86 [Direct link] [Share]
