This study asked instructors what they thought would constitute evidence of 'critical thinking' in online discussions. The responses fell into two distinct categories: "1) demonstrates logic and reasoning (described as offering accurate supporting evidence and strategies and solutions); and 2) creative critical thought processes (described as novel perceptions, bias refutation, and alternative-seeking)." The authors conclude by suggesting "that faculty should use an evaluation rubric that encompasses these two dimensions of critical thinking," but that reasoning feels a little too circular to be useful.
Today: 0 Total: 14 [Direct link] [Share]
