Improving Peer Review: Who's Responsible?
Frank Davidoff,
BMJ,
Mar 20, 2004
Is peer review too important to be left to publishers. That's the interpretation Peter Suber gives to this article, which otherwise reads as a call for greater training for peer reviewers. There is no doubt that critical assessment is necessary for science to progress. One wonders, though, why it is then practiced by a small group of academics essentially in secret, before the article ever sees the light of day.
Today: 3 Total: 7 [Direct link] [Share]
