Leadership articles are usually very bad, fostering as they do what seems to me to be an ethos of manipulation and even deceit. This article - which should use the work 'properties' rather than 'principles' is not that sort of article, as it is more interested in describing the practices that have been successful, rather than advising some go-getter on how to get ahead. There is not one of the principles I would not endorse. But I wish the article had spent some time on the 'how' - after all, in a restricted environment such as a school system, many forces act against the socially just, idealistic and activist leader.
Today: 0 Total: 12 [Direct link] [Share]
