This article (20 page PDF) reports on a literature review designed to look at recent debates on the meaning of 'open pedagogy' (I would have preferred the wider 'open educational practices' (OEP)) to identify commonalities within it, proposing "a five-part framework that encourages the long-term sustainability of open pedagogy." The discussion is pretty loose and it's hard to find a line of reasoning connecting the different accounts and the framework; indeed, far from being a set of commonalities, it looks more like they drew elements from each approach to create a union, not an intersection, or the perspectives represented.
Today: 1 Total: 23 [Direct link] [Share]
