Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What makes a difference for further advancement of engineers: socioeconomic background or education programs?

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Education is considered to be the most effective tool that people can use to lift themselves out of poor socioeconomic backgrounds and lead to professional success, which in turn improves society. Since an education system often supports individuals with a higher socioeconomic status (SES), it may not resolve the issue of socioeconomic background impacting on career outcomes. Given the nature of the research questions, an individualistic approach is used for selecting tools. Using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods, we argue that graduates studying an 8-year engineering program fail to succeed compared to counterparts who studied a 4-year engineering program. Findings suggest that engineering graduates’ socioeconomic backgrounds help them with their career advancement. A policy intervention may help to address the influence of SES on engineering education and professional employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Scaling Procedures and Construct Validation of Context Questionnaire Data. Ch. 16 (OECD Publishing, 2017).

  2. In this case, we mainly focus on the existing teaching and logistic infrastructure of the education institutions.

  3. For employer perspectives on graduates’ employability skills (Bell, 2010), we mainly conducted semi-structured interviews with personnel from two multinational corporations and government institutions.

  4. These were from both universities.

  5. Both at pre-engineering programs and engineering program.

  6. The income categories are defined by following the government’s segmentation as prescribed by BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics).

  7. After completing the JSC exam, some students can enrol in a 2-year SSC-Vocational (SSC-VOC) program, which is equivalent to the SSC.

  8. SSC graduates can go either into a HSC or DE program while SSC-VOC can enrol only in the DE program. Therefore, DE graduates from SSC-VOC have at least 6 years of vocational and engineering education.

  9. DUET graduates originally from SSC-VOC have at least 10 years of technical and engineering education while BUET students have a 4-year engineering education.

  10. MBA of Dhaka University (specifically offered by the Institute of Business Administration) is considered the most elite program in the country. Many engineers want to study this program to sharpen their managerial skills.

  11. We believe that both theories are in some contexts very similar and it is not necessarily a case of ‘either-or’.

  12. It could refer to various kinds of abilities such as innate attributes.

References

  • Alam, G. M. (2021). Clustering education policy in secondary provision: Impact on higher education and job market. International Journal of Educational Reforms, 30(1), 56–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, G. M., & Forhad, M. A. R. (2021a). Clustering secondary education and the focus on science: Impacts on higher education and the job market in Bangladesh. Comparative Education Review, 65(2), 310–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, G. M., & Forhad, M. A. R. (2021b). Roadblocks to university education for diploma engineers in Bangladesh. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 11(1), 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, G. M., Forhad, M. A. R., & Ismi, A. (2020). Can education as an ‘International Commodity’ be the backbone or cane of a nation in the era of fourth industrial revolution? - A comparative study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120184.

  • Alam, G. M., Mishra, P. K., & Shahjamal, M. M. (2014). Quality assurance strategies for affiliated institutions of HE: A case study of the affiliates under National University of Bangladesh. Higher Education, 68(2), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, G. M., Parvin, M., & Roslan, S. (2020). Growth of private university business following “oligopoly” and “SME” approaches: An impact on the concept of university and on society. Society and Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-06-2020-0083.

  • BANBEIS Reports from (2020). Bangladesh Education Statistics. Ministry of Education

  • Banerjee, A., Ferrara, F. L., & Victor, O. (2019). Entertainment, education, and attitudes toward domestic violence. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109(1), 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.

  • Bell, J. (2010). Doing your research project. Open University.

  • Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of economics: Or, how economists explain. Cambridge University Press.

  • Bos, J. M., Huston, A. C., Granger, R. C., Duncan, G. J., Brock, T. W., & McLoyd, V. C. (1999). New hope for people with low incomes: Two-year results of a program to reduce poverty and reform welfare.

  • Child Trends (2015). Parental expectations for their children’s academic attainment. Available at. http://www.childtrends.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/07/115_Parental_Expectations.pdf. Accessed 20 August 2020.

  • Chowdhury, R., & Sarkar, M. (2018). Education in Bangladesh: Changing contexts and emerging realities. In R. Chowdhury, M. Sarkar, F. Mojumder, & M. Roshid (Eds.), Engaging in educational research. Education in the Asia-Pacific region: Issues, concerns and prospects, vol 44. Springer.

  • Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2010). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (1998). Common agency contracting and the emergence of "Open Science" Institutions. The American Economic Review 88(2), 15–21

  • Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G. L. (2009). What is engineering studies for? Dominant practices and scalable scholarship. Engineering Studies 1(1), 55–76.

  • Egerton, M. (2002). Higher education and civic engagement. The British Journal of Sociology, 53(4), 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feibleman, J. K. (1961). Pure Science, Applied Science, Technology, Engineering: An Attempt at Definitions, Technology and Culture 2(4), 305-317.

  • Goodman, D., (2014). Class in contemporary China: Polity Press.

  • Green, L. W. (1970). Manual for scoring socioeconomic status for research on health behaviour. Public Health Reports, 85(9), 815–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heynse, B., and Michelson, S., (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America: Basic Books.

  • Johansson, C. (2000) Communicating, Measuring and Preserving Knowledge in Software Development, Kaserntryckeriet AB, Sweden.

  • Jones, M. K. (2008). Disability and the labour market: A review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Studies, 35(5), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, A. P., & Sullivan, A. L. (2017). Parsing the relations of race and socioeconomic status in special education disproportionality. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. S. (1991). The polytechnics: a peculiarly British phenomenon. Regional Development 2(4), 24–34.

  • Liu, J., Peng, P., & Luo, L. (2020). The relation between family socioeconomic status and academic achievement in China: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena, J., & Schneider, J. (2008). Engineers, development, and engineering education: From national to sustainable community development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(33), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2019). Limitation of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjoribanks, K. (1979). Families and their learning environments: An empirical analysis: Routledge

  • McDermott, P. A., & Spencer, M. B. (1997). Racial and social class prevalence of psychopathology among school-age youth in the United States. Youth & Society, 28(4), 387–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 66(4), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistry, R. S., Vanderwater, E. A., Houston, A. C., & McLoyd, V. C. (2002). Economic well-being and children’s social adjustment: The role of family process in an ethnically diverse low-income sample. Child Development, 73(3), 935–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., & Poist, R. F. (2007). Skill requirements of senior-level logisticians: A longitudinal assessment. Supply Chain Management, 12(6), 423–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuenschwander, M. P., Vida, M., Garrett, J. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). Parents” expectations and students” achievement in two western nations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(6), 594–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. H. (1852). The idea of university defined and illustrated. Oxford University Press.

  • Noel, S., & de Broucker, P. (2001). Intergenerational inequities: A comparative analysis of the influence of parents’ educational background on length of schooling and literacy skills. In W. Hutmacher, D. Cochrane, & N. Bottani (Eds.), In pursuit of equity in education: Using international indicators to compare equity policies (pp. 277–298). Kluwer Academic.

  • Perry, L. B. (2012). Causes and effects of school socio-economic composition? A review of the literature. Education and Society, 30(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickety, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Belknap Press, Cambridge.

  • Piketty and Seaz (2013) in the text and reference is Piketty, T. and Seaz, E. (2013) A Theory of Optimal Inheritance Taxation Econometrica, 81(5), 1851–1886.

  • Poon, K. (2020). The impact of socioeconomic status on parental factors in promoting academic achievement in Chinese children. International Journal of Educational Development, 75, 102175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, W. C., & Song, X. (2011). The impact of education on unemployment incidence and re-employment success: Evidence from the US labour market. Labour Economics, 18(4), 453–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. (2017) Rigor/Us: Building Boundaries and Disciplining Diversity with Standards of Merit. Engineering Studies 9 (3), 249–265.

  • Rivera, L., (2015). Pedigree: How elite students get elite jobs: Princeton

  • Schultz, T. (1961). Capital formation by education. Journal of Political Economy, 68(6), 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, J. (2007). The power of privilege: Yale and America’s elite colleges. Stanford University Press.

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job marketing signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1975). The theory of “screening”, education, and the distribution of income. American Economic Review, 65, 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, E. (2014). Human capital theory: A holistic criticism. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 411–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trace, S. R. (2015). The role of the engineer in developing countries. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers- Municipal Engineers, 103(2), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triventi, M. (2013). Stratification in higher education and its relationship with social inequality: A comparative study of 11 European countries. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triyono, M. B., & Mateeke Moses, K. (2019). Technical and vocational education and training and training in Indonesia. In B. B. Paryono (Ed.), Vocational education and training in ASEAN member states. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6617-8_3.

  • Tynkkynen, L., Tolvanen, A., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2012). Trajectories of educational expectations from adolescence to young adulthood in Finland. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. K. (2019). Property value as a proxy of socioeconomic status in education. Education and Urban Society, 51(1), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. (1995). Human capital vs. signalling explanations of wages. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. (2017). Higher education, elite formation and social stratification in contemporary China: Preliminary findings from the Beijing College Students Panel Survey. Chines Journal of Sociology, 3, 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, New York: Harper and Row.

  • Young, M., & Hordern, J. (2020). Does the vocational curriculum have a future? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1833078.

  • Zhao, W. (2012). Economic inequality, status perceptions, and subjective well-being in China’s transitional economy. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(4), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We greatly acknowledge the comments made by the reviewers and Professor Simon Marginson (Editor-Higher Education). Without their thorough input, the manuscript would not have reached its enriched version. We would also like to express our gratitude to Professor Christine Ennew Provost, University of Warwick and Professor Charlie Russo, University of Dayton for their kind insights with innovative ways to deal with the reviewers’ comments. Especial thanks to Mr. Md. Moniruzzaman, Deputy Registrar, DUET who died from being infected by COVID-19 and Ms. Morsheda Parvin who provided a unique support for data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gazi Mahabubul Alam.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alam, G.M., Forhad, M.A.R. What makes a difference for further advancement of engineers: socioeconomic background or education programs?. High Educ 83, 1259–1278 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00741-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00741-4

Keywords