Skip to main content
Log in

Design Judgments in the Creation of eLearning Modules

  • Published:
Journal of Formative Design in Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As eLearning becomes an increasingly common strategy to minimize instructional disruptions caused by illness, weather, professional development, and other planned and unplanned events, teachers need to gain the knowledge and skills necessary to design and facilitate these non-traditional learning experiences. Informed by survey and interview data, we developed three learning modules designed to assist PK-12 teachers in preparing, planning, and facilitating eLearning experiences. In describing this design process, we focus this case on design judgments, described here as the deliberate and unconscious thinking processes experienced by designers in the design and development of learning experiences. Through this experience, we found that design judgments occur constantly throughout the design process and manifest themselves in non-linear and sometimes unpredictable ways. With this focus on design judgments, we aim to provide a view of instructional design that can sensitize designers to the complexities of authentic design experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Boling, E., Alangari, H., Hajdu, I., Guo, M., Gyabak, K., Khlaif, Z., … Tomita, K. (2017). Core judgments of instructional designers in practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 30(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq

  • Demiral-Uzan, M. (2017). The development of design judgment in instruction design students during a semester in their graduate program (Publication No. 10690456) Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

  • Digital Learning Collaborative. (2019). eLearning days: A scan of policy and guidance. https://www.digitallearningcollab.com. Accessed 5 April 2021

  • Dunne, J. (1999). Professional judgment and the predicaments of practice. European Journal of Marketing, 33(7/8), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910274339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., York, C. S., & Gedik, N. (2009). Learning from the pros: How experienced designers translate instructional design models into practice. Educational Technology, January-Fe, 19–26.

  • Göksu, I., Özcan, K. V., Çakir, R., & Göktas, Y. (2017). Content analysis of research trends in instructional design models: 1999–2014. Journal of Learning Design, 10(2), 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. M., & Boling, E. (2018). Designers’ articulation and activation of instrumental design judgements in cross-cultural user research. CoDesign, 14(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1393546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. M., Dagli, C., Demiral-Uzan, M., Ergulec, V. T., Altuwaijri, A. A., Gyabak, K., … Boling, E. (2015). Judgment and instructional design: How ID practitioners work in practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(3), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq

  • Gray, L., & Lewis, L. (2020). Teachers’ use of technology for school and homework assignments: 2018–19 (NCES 2020–048). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved June 23, 2020, from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020048.pdf. Accessed 5 April 2021

  • Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Hein, S., Wang, K., Roberts, A., Cui, J., Smith, M., Bullock Mann, F., Barmer, A., & Dilig, R. (2020). The condition of education 2020 (NCES 2020–144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved June 23, 2020, from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020144.pdf. Accessed 5 April 2021

  • Indiana Department of Education. (2020). eLearning day program. https://www.doe.in.gov/eLearning/eLearning-day-program. Accessed 5 April 2021

  • Kirschner, P., Carr, C., van Merrienboer, J., & Sloep, P. (2002). How expert designers design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(4), 86–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, A. A., & Farmer, T. (2020). Preparing for eLearning using digital learning plans. In R. E. Ferdig, E. Baumgartner, R. Hartshorne, R. Kaplan-Rakowski, & C. Mouza (Eds.), Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field (pp. 47-53). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/

  • Korkmaz, N., & Boling, E. (2014). Development of design judgment in instructional design: Perspectives from instructors, students, and instructional designers. In Design in Educational Technology: Design Thinking, Design Process, and the Design Studio (pp. 161–184). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00927-8

  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. G. & Stolterman, E. (2014). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. The MIT Press.

  • Parsons, P., Gray, C. M., Baigelenov, A., & Carr, I. (2020). Design judgment in data visualization practice. IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS), USA, 176-180. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00042

  • Smith, K. M., & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology, 49(4), 3–17. Retrieved from https://about.jstor.org/terms. Accessed 5 April 2021

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2012). National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/. Accessed 5 April 2021

  • Zhu, M., Basdogan, M., & Bonk, C. J. (2020). A case study of the design practices and judgments of novice instructional designers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/7829

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadd Farmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farmer, T., Koehler, A. Design Judgments in the Creation of eLearning Modules. J Form Des Learn 6, 1–12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-022-00063-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-022-00063-3

Keywords