I like this paper because the authors are trying to think methodically about the decisions that are made in the learning design process (compare with my approach in analytics). The bulk of the paper is an extended discussion of each of the ten steps (which range from framing to composition to navigation). I think we understand that, although the process (illustrated) is depicted as a linear model, the actual process may vary the order of the steps, loop back, or cycle through the decisions iteratively. As the authors say, "We have shown that these judgments are constant throughout the design process and often occur simultaneously with each other in interesting and sometimes unpredictable ways."
Today: 0 Total: 16 [Direct link] [Share]
